• What is the extent of the illegal organized cigarette trade in South Africa? How much money is lost annually to the South African economy as a result? We answer these and other important questions in an article published in Servamus: January 2021.

  • Servamus subscribers stand the chance of winning a BYRNA Less-lethal firearm (no need for permits). Turn to p21 of Servamus: January 2021 to find out what you need to do to win this awesome prize worth R7500!

  • COVID-19 has exacerbated the threat of crimes that are committed in the pharmaceutical industry, such as counterfeiting and fraud, as large consignments of counterfeit medical products have been distributed. Our article published from p24 in Servamus: January 2021, reveals more details.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
0
0
0
s2smodern
powered by social2s

By Annalise Kempen

The job of a "private investigator" or PI is synonymous with images of the sexy Thomas Magnum, a former Navy seal, who drives around in a red Ferrari on the beautiful island of Hawaii, in the similarly named television series Magnum PI. The series gives viewers the impression that all PIs repurpose the skills they obtained during their former military or law enforcement careers, to assist their clients in getting some form of justice. Their clients usually have a valid reason why they prefer not to involve the police directly or immediately in the investigation. The television series also plays on the love-hate relationship between Magnum and one of Hawaii's top detectives. And, if you are not familiar with Magnum, then surely the name of Sherlock Holmes, a fictional private detective, will ring a bell.

Although crime is rife in South Africa, law enforcement-related careers are not necessarily the most financially rewarding options to choose. Therefore, the majority of private investigators (PIs) have a slim chance of having the same image and lifestyle as their television counterpart, Thomas Magnum. And yet, there are many dedicated individuals who will fight for the greater good to ensure that justice is served, either as law enforcers employed by the State or as private investigators, despite not earning the biggest of salaries. Private investigators are playing an increasingly critical role in the investigation of crime, specifically in terms of financial and cyber-related crime.

Since not everyone is familiar with the world of private investigators in our country, Servamus asked two PIs to share their experiences and comments about this industry. One of the PIs is self-employed, while the other is the CEO of a well-known company that has a number of investigators in their employ.

Defining a private investigator
The legal authority that defines a private investigator is found in section 1(1) of the Private Security Industry Regulation Act 56 of 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the PSIRA Act). It defines a private investigator as follows:

A “person who, in a private capacity and for the benefit of another person, investigates the identity, actions, character, background or property of another person, without the consent of such a person, but does not include –

(a) auditors, accountants, attorneys, advocates or forensic scientists conducting investigations which fall within the normal and reasonable course and scope of their professional functions;

(b) internal investigators conducting normal and reasonable investigations into employee misconduct;

(c) internal investigators conducting investigations which a business, other than an investigating business, may undertake in the course and scope of its normal and reasonable endeavours to safeguard its security, strategic, operational or business interests:

Provided that no person is excluded from the definition of a private investigator if he or she conducts any investigation which falls within the exclusive function of the State;..”

The PSIRA Act makes it clear that performing the functions of a private investigator, is regarded as rendering a “security service”.

Section 20(1) of the PSIRA Act obligates all security services that render such a service for remuneration, reward, a fee or benefit, to be registered with the Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (PSIRA).

“(2) A security business may only be registered as a security service provider -

(a) if all the persons performing executive or managing functions in respect of such security business are registered as security service providers; and

(b) in the case of a security business which is a company, close corporation, partnership, business trust or foundation, if every director of the company, every member of the close corporation, every partner of the partnership, every trustee of the business trust, and every administrator of the foundation, as the case may be, is registered as a security service provider.”

All private investigators need to renew their registration every two years.

It is vital to note that all private investigators have to be registered in their personal capacities which registration is valid for two years. However, a private investigator cannot use his or her personal PSIRA registration to render a service - he or she has to work for a PSIRA registered company with its own unique registration number which has to be renewed annually. PSIRA conducts inspections of all registered private investigation companies' premises.

According to the 2018/2019 Annual Report of PSIRA, 1313 private investigator businesses were registered with PSIRA during the 2017/2018 report year, while the number increased to 1810 during the 2018/2019 report year.

Code of conduct
All security service providers, including private investigators, are subjected to the PSIRA code of conduct. This code gives details about the responsibilities and obligations of a security service provider that performs the functions of a private investigator. Such an investigator -

(a) may not perform any act which interferes with, hinders or obstructs a security service or an organ of State in performing any function that it may lawfully perform, or advise or agree with a client to perform such an act;

(b) may not advise, assist or incite a client or any other person to commit an offence, a delict, breach of contract or any other type of unlawful act;

(c) may not undertake or assist in the entrapment of any person for the purposes of obtaining evidence of an offence, a delict or breach of contract unless such conduct is permitted in terms of law and any official permission that may be legally required, has been obtained;

(d) may not conceal facts regarding the commission of an offence from a security service or any organ of State, or agree with a client to conceal such facts from a security service or any organ of State;..

******************************

[This is only an extract of an article published in Servamus: November 2020. The rest of the article discusses more about the code of conduct for the private security; looks at some of the requirements, skills and qualifications needed for private investigators; discusses the importance of continuous training and accreditation; the law and case law in favour of private investigations; the types of investigation conducted by private investigators. If you are interested in reading the complete article, contact Servamus’s offices by sending an e-mail to: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or contacting us at tel: (012) 345 4660/41.]

0
0
0
s2smodern
powered by social2s

Servamus - January 2021

A lack of employment and job opportunities is often considered to be an important reason for criminal behaviour.
By Kotie Geldenhuys
Towards the end of March 2020, the President, Mr Cyril Ramaphosa, announced that as of midnight on 26 March 2020, South Africa would go into a "hard lockdown".
By Kotie Geldenhuys
The current worldwide COVID-19 pandemic which resulted in various lockdown levels across the world, has opened new opportunities for criminals to exploit people - especially in cyberspace.
By Annalise Kempen
Families across the world have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic which will likely have a long-lasting impact on public health and our well-being.
By Kotie Geldenhuys

Pollex - January 2021

Read More - S v Leshilo (345/2019) [2020] ZASCA 98 (8 September 2020) (SCA)
Mr Moshidi Danny Leshilo (hereinafter referred to as “the accused”), was accused 1 before the regional court, Pretoria (“the trial court”) where he was convicted on 11 June 2014 of housebreaking with the intent to commit an unknown offence in terms of section 262 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (count 1); the unlawful possession of a firearm (count 2); and the unlawful possession of ammunition (count 3).
Read More - S v JA 2017 (2) SACR 143 (NCK)
Mr JA, the accused who is from Port Nolloth on the northern part of the South African west coast, was convicted of rape before the regional court, Springbok in Namaqualand.
Read More - S v Ndlovu 2017 (2) SACR 305 (CC)
Relevant legislation (1) Section 3 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007 provides for the offence of rape simpliciter (Afrikaans: “sonder voorbehoud”).

Letters - January 2021

Hearty congratulations to Sgt T S Moletsane of the Beaufort West Stock Theft Unit who was awarded as the Best Member of a Stock Theft Unit - for the fourth consecutive year!
January Magazine Cover

Servamus' Mission

Servamus is a community-based safety and security magazine for both members of the community as well as safety and security practitioners with the aim of increasing knowledge and sharing information, dedicated to improving their expertise, professionalism and service delivery standards. It promotes sound crime management practices, freedom of speech, education, training, information sharing and a networking platform.